Which of the following is NOT reviewable in a game using video review?

• A. A foul ball called on a batted ball that bounced over the fence.
• B. A foul ball called where the offense challenges that it is fair.
• C. A foul ball called where the offense claims it hit the hand, not the knob.
• D. A play involving a runner being tagged out at home plate.

Answer: (B)

The correct choice indicates a scenario that is not eligible for review. In NCAA softball, video review is used to ensure that the game's integrity is maintained by allowing for certain calls to be revisited. However, not all calls fall under this category, particularly subjective decisions made by the umpires.

In this case, a foul ball call is inherently subjective when it comes to determining if a ball that was hit is fair or foul. While the offense can challenge other types of foul ball calls—such as one that seems to have hit a player or another decision on a batted ball—the specific instance of whether a ball is fair or foul is decided based on the umpire's judgment at that moment. Thus, it remains a non-reviewable call unless it pertains to distinct and clear aspects such as the ball’s interaction with the player or the environment around the field.

In contrast, the other scenarios involve more definitive aspects that can often be reviewed through video evidence, such as determining whether a ball cleared the fence (a distinct boundary call) or if a runner was tagged at home plate (a clear play that has a definitive beginning and end). These instances allow for the utilization of video replay technology to ensure accuracy in the call. Thus, the identified choice